New and Notable WebQuests for October

First up: Hoosier Who's Who. This is a nice example of using the WebQuest format to enliven the usual study-your-own-state lesson which, let's admit it, is often a snoozer. It turns out that this is a good example of a design pattern, Simulated Interview, that I've had a partial draft of for years but haven't finished. With this example to point to, I'll be adding simulated interview to the patterns list soon.
Next, The Confederated States of America. Nice example of the Alternate History pattern. It has a KWL chart and some scaffolding about how to write a term paper. If it just had a little more scaffolding about the main task of extrapolating an alternate timeline, it would be perfect!

Netiquette: Making a Big Decision has an appealingly dark look. It incorporates role playing as learners grapple with inappropriate technology use in a school setting from multiple perspectives.
The Puritans and Punishment: What a Pair! gives students the task of developing a how-to manual for Puritans as they face a number of sticky situations (e.g., a wife who won't obey). It's all done with a light wackiness that makes it fun to read.

And finally, A Home on Ganymede was a welcome sight. Over the years I've seen dozens of WebQuests which ask kids to design a human habitat on the planet of their choice, which inevitably leads to them making settlements on Jupiter or Mercury or other planets completely unsuitable for homesteading with any imaginable technology. The task is untenable and it makes kids dumber about science than if they'd never done the lesson at all. In contrast to those, this WebQuest does a very nice job of lining up resources and structuring things so that kids would learn about the hard science of making a space colony on a solid body somewhere in the solar system.
There are a lot more promising WebQuests coming to life in the QuestGarden. Next month, I'll point out some more.
4 Comments:
Well as far as we can tell, all these WebQuests were written by humans and that suggests that they're all flawed in some way. I even stated in the article "They're not all perfect and maybe not even finished yet, but they all had something interesting about them to make them worthy of a look." I pointed out what I liked about each, but I didn't mean to imply that each of these was an exemplar in all respects.
Dan, if you don't like it, don't look at it. Why should you discourage others?
I am thankful for this "new" site and for the quests posted here. Flawed or not, they provide the info I need for my undergraduate preservice teachers to learn what, why and how. These teachers will not make their own if they cannot see someone else's. I encourage them to move out,do more, be more creative than the ones they have seen here. They try and sometimes succeed. Please keep up the great work.
Not all WebQuest are going to be perfect. I think they are great. It adds flavor to learning. I don't expect the webquest to do my job and neither should you. Find the objectives you want to cover; if you don't see them covered in a particular webquest, add to your lesson what is lacking. I use webquest with small groups of students to meet additional needs that they may have. It keeps students from getting bored with the same ole stuff.
Post a Comment
<< Home